iOS 7
If you’re an iPhone or iPad user Apple had a shiny new gift for you this week; iOS 7. I know, I know, it’s a bit of a jolt. I won’t lie. I hated it for a few days, but it’s beginning to grow on me. I’ve heard this time and again “Give it a few days.” I’ve given it a few days and it still seems a bit stark, but overall I’m happy with it. My trusty iPhone 4 seems much faster than it did with iOS 6. Bonus.
Benefit to Developers
I’ve written a few iOS apps over the last few years. Some have been lovingly designed by professional designers, others, like our own RxCalc were kept intentionally simple. Why? Truth be told Jay and I don’t possess the ability to make beautiful imagery for our app, so the design has to be simple. We developed our app using plain old UIKit, it works really well, is fast, and the binary is tiny.
With iOS 7 the bar has been lowered. A generic looking application looked fresh when iOS hit the streets. There were developers that created their own style and look, and, in turn, third party developers began to define the look of the OS, not Apple. Think about developers like Iconfactory, Tapbots, and Path. They all introduced applications that took the look and feel of applications way beyond standard UIKit, and that’s great. They stood on the shoulders of giants and moved the bar higher so the rest of the app ecosystem had something to reach for.
Third party developers created Pull to Refresh, the Hamburger and the Basement, and alternatives to UITabBar. All were very good innovations and gave us beautiful, very functional, applications. But there is a downside.
If you go against the Apple playbook, which isn’t a bad thing, you may end up creating something that doesn’t feel at home on a future release of an OS. Since iOS 7 shipped I’ve seen numerous folks comment about how outdated forward thinking and innovative applications like Tweetbot look.
Tweetbot looks terrible on iOS 7
— John Heaton (@JohnRHeaton) June 11, 2013
I’m sure we’ll see an update for Tweetbot soon, but the point is, if your app has a completely custom UI it may take a lot of time and effort to make it look right in iOS 7.
Back to RxCalc and our choice to use UIKit, without custom design elements. Here’s how RxCalc looks on iOS 6 and prior, and it looks this what on iOS 7 before being recompiled:
It’s not flashy, but it looks similar to Apple’s own Settings app, or Mail, on iOS 6.
Making an app new again
If you created a simple UIKit application your road to iOS 7 is simple. Most of the hard work has been done. You can recompile and your application looks new again.
Here’s what RxCalc looks likes when it’s recompiled with the iOS 7 SDK. No additional work, just a simple rebuild.
Can it be spruced up a bet? Sure it can, but I can put this in the store today and it will look like it belongs.
That’s why I tweeted this a few days back:
I need to write about why I believe design on iOS 7 will be easier. It's not what you think.
— Rob Fahrni (@Fahrni) September 16, 2013
It is super easy to get a fresh UI if you stuck to generic UIKit.
Reset
The bar has been reset, time for a new generation of user interface innovation.
Thanks, Apple.
One reply on “iOS 7 Lowers the Bar”
This is a great example of the benefits (and limitations) of sticking with the standard controls and features supplied by the platform. You get an easy move to the new UI design style when it inevitably comes around.
But then you can’t do innovative things like Tweetbot and other apps did.
The thing I find most interesting, though, is the way all our perceptions about what good UI is change over time. A few years ago, iOS looked fresh and modern and good. And now pre-v7 iOS has a lot of elements that look clunky and dated.
It would be a fascinating study to look at all the things in our environment and society that push these changes. It’s got to go beyond just software and into fashion, media, industrial design, etc.
What would be even more fascinating (and there’s no way to do this) would be to take designs that we think are great-looking today and take them back a decade or two or even more. Would they look cool and futuristic to people back then or would they just look stupid?